Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <20020710151459.92303.qmail@web21008.mail.yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 08:14:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: Nicholas Wourms <nwourms AT yahoo DOT com>
Subject: Re: Toplevel configury of src
To: Nathanael Nerode <neroden AT doctormoo DOT dyndns DOT org>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc: neroden AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org
In-Reply-To: <20020709183342.GA18151@doctormoo.dyndns.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


--- Nathanael Nerode <neroden AT doctormoo DOT dyndns DOT org> wrote:
> The toplevel configury of src is, as all you developers know, a mess.
> I've been trying to clean it up over at gcc.  I ran into a bizarre
> situation and was told that Cygwin people might be able to help clear it
> up.
> 
> Suppose you're building a combined tree of some sort with target
> *-*-cygwin*
> powerpc*-*-winnt*
> powerpc*-*-pe*
> ppc*-*-pe
> 
> According to the comments, newlib is 'always' built.  This is false.
> 
> If --without-newlib was specified and host=target, the newlib in the
> tree is not built.
> 
> If --without-newlib is specified and host!=target, the newlib in the
> tree is built, but it isn't used; --with-newlib isn't passed to
> subconfigures, and nothing is added to FLAGS_FOR_TARGET for newlib.
> 
> This is almost certainly wrong behavior.
> 
> How should --without-newlib behave when targeting *-*-cygwin* (and the
> others)?
> 
> Should it mean "Don't build or use the newlib in the tree; use installed
> libs and headers, or the ones specified with --with-libs and
> --with-headers"?
> 
> Should it be illegal, and give an error message?
> 
> Should it be unspecified, in which case I can change its behavior for
> code cleanliness?
> 
> Please send responses to neroden AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org.  Thanks.
Hmm,

Perhaps switching everthing over to
Autoconf-2.53/Automake-1.6.2/Libtool-1.4e compatible versions might help?

Cheers,
Nicholas

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
http://sbc.yahoo.com

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/