Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Originating-IP: [129.78.64.17]
From: "Gareth Pearce" <tilps AT hotmail DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: another cygwin using program...
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 06:36:52 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F117TiXLl7xukvO4vJJ00008d15@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Jul 2002 06:36:52.0854 (UTC) FILETIME=[2D722960:01C227DC]



>
>On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 06:02:55AM +0000, Gareth Pearce wrote:
> >>> > > http://freeware.teledanmark.no/identd/
> >>> > > uses cygwin1.dll - and might not be providing source ... I
> >>> > > cant find it...
> >>> >
> >>> >You didn't look very hard.  Source is included in the same
> >>> >archive as the executable.
> >>>
> >>> cygwin1.dll source to be specific
> >>
> >>Sorry.  That wasn't clear.
> >>
> >>> I did indeed find the source to identd in the obvious place.
> >>
> >>Yep.  And they point to Cygwin, but thier alternate site for Cygwin has 
>the
> >>old B20 version.  Will thier code build against the current version of 
>the
> >>DLL?  If not, they aren't in compliance with the GPL.
> >>
> >
> >previous mailing list discussions on this topic state that if they
> >distribute the cygwin1.dll, they have to distribute the source code for 
>that
> >
> >particular version.
>
>You are correct, sir.
>
> >So either way its a violation. (ie linking isnt good enough, according to
> >previous discussions) - I am still in digital unix at uni so i have no 
>idea
> >if it compiles with current cygwin, anyway.
> >
> >But, it was a headsup, not a 'i am deeply concerned about this' or I 
>would
> >of emailed the person responsible for the web site in the first place.  
>If i
> >was one of the cygwin developers, maybe i would feel differently, but as 
>a
> >user headsup is enough from me.
>
>Yep.  I wouldn't want to subject a user to the pain of sending this kind of
>email.  Seriously.  It's never fun.
>
>I'll probably send something off as soon as I can ensure that my spirit is
>pure and my will is strong.
>
>Thanks for the heads up.  It is appreciated.  Keem em coming.
>
>cgf

<sarcasm off>
lol

always a great wit there - the bridge one earlier had the office and the mud 
laughing :)

but 'seriously' i just dont care enough to send one onwards to the person.  
But, I think it is just wrong, to not let the people who Might care, know.

Wierd point of view, yes
but thats me.

<sarcasm back on>

Gareth - seriously going to start work on a new release of nano any day now





_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/