Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <20020709160108.75159.qmail@web40203.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 09:01:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Motivus Subject: Re: Compiling with Borland C++ 5.5.1 To: John Vincent Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii --- John Vincent wrote: > > Hi, > > I don't think you'll get much help regarding the > borland > compiler and cygwin from this list, since a > perfectly > good C/C++ compiler is packaged as part of cygwin. > The > usual GNU compiler can be selected when you run > setup to > install cygwin. Do you have a good reason to use the > borland > compiler instead? > > /John Vincent. > No, apparently I have no good reason to use the Borland compiler... ;-) I was just misunderstanding the entire process of installing the native toolchain under Cygwin and then building the desired cross-development toolchain under Cygwin. I didn't even realize the senselessness of what I was asking until it was too late. First, I was only dimly aware... and then, as answers like yours started coming in, I felt like Fox Mulder's sister standing in that open doorway bathed in an alien illumination. I'm back on track, thanks. Mvus __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free http://sbc.yahoo.com -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/