Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Paul Butcher Organization: ASA Ltd. To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Available for test: gcc-3.1.1-1, gcc2-2.95.3-6, and gcc-mingw-3_1-20020516-1 Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 09:44:55 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: Nicholas Wourms wrote: >--- Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >> Nope. I am not interested in supporting objective c at this point. If >> I was it would be a separate package anyway. > > Well will there be a point at which you will be? Porting some, if not > all, of the GNUStep environment can't happen until you do so. Hopefully > when you see it fit to provide Ada support, you will provide the > objective-c compiler. If you don't want to support it ever, will you > allow someone else to package it and submit for "official" inclusion? Can I put another vote in for this one - the lack of objC in recent cygwin gcc builds has been a real problem forcing people to use the mingw gcc. I've recently compiled gcc V3.1 with cygwin including objC with no problem so there doesn't seem to be much "support" needed. The size added to the overall package is negligable, certainly compared to F77 which probably ought to be separately packaged, like ADA. (It works even better if you replace the libobjc with that from GNUstep as this allows DLLs and makes the runtime a DLL.) Otherwise well done for getting gcc 3.x into cygwin build at last - look forward to the fully released version when ready. Will be interesting if you can get libgcj working too as you're currently trying to do. Paul Butcher Alton, Hants, UK -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/