Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
Path: not-for-mail
From: Scott Evans <gse AT antisleep DOT com>
Newsgroups: gmane.os.cygwin
Subject: status of stat() ?
Date: 08 Jul 2002 16:02:01 -0400
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <ptxydm4m.fsf@templarcorp.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 209-19-232-50.customer.algx.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1026158477 3429 209.19.232.50 (8 Jul 2002 20:01:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 20:01:17 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp (Windows [1]))

A couple months ago there were a few patches suggested to improve the
performance of stat() calls.  Here's one:
 http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-05/msg01600.html

I haven't seen any results from these patches -- searched the mailing
list and still nothing.  Just curious if anyone's looked at them,
considered them, etc.  I'd love to see stat() operations get faster
(but I don't have time to dig into the code myself at the moment, so 
I know I'm not in a position to ask much).  



--
 scott evans :: www.antisleep.com




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/