Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3D29AFD6.4050304@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 11:29:26 -0400 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Available for test: gcc-3.1.1-1, gcc2-2.95.3-6, and gcc-mingw-3_1-20020516-1 References: <20020707032010 DOT GA22463 AT redhat DOT com> <3D28FCF6 DOT 40808 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020708031758 DOT GC2440 AT redhat DOT com> <3D2911C5 DOT 8010909 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020708052729 DOT GA27657 AT redhat DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Christopher Faylor wrote: > I don't see exactly the same errors. I can't even compile your stuff > with g++. :-( It appears to be due to --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs, > AFAICT. Right -- I had to change #include to , etc. I'm not real familiar with the source-level changes that gcc-3.x *forces* onto people -- but I'm not real happy about them. The price of progress, I suppose. Does anybody know of a good reference, along the lines of "What changed in g++ between gcc-2.95.3 and gcc-3.x"? I'm not talking about the innards of gcc; but rather, user-visible changes that force me to change my perfectly good 2.95.3 C++ code so that it'll compile with g++ 3.x. --Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/