Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" From: "Ph. Marek" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: patch for /proc/registry read/write?? Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 08:48:20 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <200207080848.20302.marek@bmlv.gv.at> X-Virus-Scanned: TAMIZ + Sophos en unizar.es Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g686p2q00377 Hello everybody, I've just downloaded the 1.3.12-2 version and was surprised to see that the registry-patch (which was heavily discussed in february, if I recall correctly) has made it into the mainline. But one question remains: Is there a patch for read/write support? I know that this starts the old problem of specifying the kind of value (dword, sz, multi-sz, binary, ...) but maybe this could by done by the extension (possibly seperated by a : as this ain't used in cygwin), so eg. name:sz or value:dword. What I'd like to achieve is to use rsync on the registry - to get the registry into a known state. I don't think that the naming scheme gives consistency problems - if I write a file name:sz it isn't guaranteed (in unix semantics) that name:dword isn't deleted in the same moment. Any help appreciated! Regards, Phil -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/