Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 01:27:29 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Available for test: gcc-3.1.1-1, gcc2-2.95.3-6, and gcc-mingw-3_1-20020516-1 Message-ID: <20020708052729.GA27657@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20020707032010 DOT GA22463 AT redhat DOT com> <3D28FCF6 DOT 40808 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020708031758 DOT GC2440 AT redhat DOT com> <3D2911C5 DOT 8010909 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D2911C5.8010909@ece.gatech.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 12:15:01AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: > > >Christopher Faylor wrote: > > >> >>Thanks for the test case. I see these too. I know what's going on. > > >I'm glad you do -- because my guess was wrong. I see the same errors >using regular g++ (3.1.1). I don't see exactly the same errors. I can't even compile your stuff with g++. :-( It appears to be due to --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs, AFAICT. I'll respin both packages ASAP. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/