Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3D28B547.5020201@beamreachnetworks.com> Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2002 14:40:23 -0700 From: "Eric M. Monsler" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020314 Netscape6/6.2.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Pitot CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Shells and makefiles are still very slow with cygwin References: <000501c224db$f7c4c1e0$0200a8c0 AT duron850> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Paul Pitot wrote: > Shells and makefiles are still very slow with cygwin > > I use cygwin for about 2 years and do not see any real response to this > simple question : > Why a simple shell script like this is so slow ? I'm sorry, I just can't stand idly by in the face of the previous sarcastic replies. I figure that you deserve a more helpful reply, one that might actually (someday) make it run nearly as fast as a native POSIX environment. Additionally, it might help future users who are searching the archives, trying desperately to find a way to get lighting fast shell script and makefile execution. The problem is that YOU, yes YOU, have not downloaded the sources, profiled and identified the slow parts, and contributed SUS and POSIX-ly correct speed-up patches to the cygwin project. HTH. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/