Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <20020707202016.17131.qmail@web21009.mail.yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 13:20:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: Nicholas Wourms <nwourms AT yahoo DOT com>
Subject: Re: gcc-3.1.x [was: Re: Using only the X server of Cygwin]
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To: <3D28A10A.7010205@ece.gatech.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


--- Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> wrote:
> [follow up to the cygwin list; this is getting off-topic for
> cygwin-xfree.]
> 
> Nicholas Wourms wrote:
> 
> >>Hey, Nicholas -- don't squish Rhialto that quickly.  He's probably one
> 
> >>of our new users who knows nothing about the cygwin project except
> what 
> >>he read on slashdot this morning.
>  
> > I am still cranky about the refusal to include objc in cygwin/gcc-3.1.
> 
> 
> Look, now is NOT the time for objc.  It's too early.

For the record, I was just kidding... though I guess it didn't come off
that way because of our private conversation.  I've already made my case
previously.  I have evaluated your points, and I couldn't agree more.  Now
isn't the time for Obj-C, now is the time for testing what we do have.

Cheers,
Nicholas

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
http://sbc.yahoo.com

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/