Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 00:24:08 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: g++ global constructor bug? Message-ID: <20020706042408.GA20252@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <200207052009 DOT g65K9Fr00451 AT new-york DOT lcs DOT mit DOT edu> <20020705203014 DOT GA18639 AT redhat DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020705203014.GA18639@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 04:30:14PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 04:09:15PM -0400, Douglas S. J. De Couto wrote: >>the following program doesn't work right with cygwin, it seems the >>global object sh constructor is not being called. > >If I had to guess I'd say that the constructor is kicked off before >stdio is completely set up. ...and my guess would be wrong. Constructors get kicked off first thing in main. That's plenty late enough in the process. However, the constructor list is empty in this case so nothing actually happens. Looks like this is a variation of the binutils bug that was mentioned earlier. Does this go away if you revert to the binutils-20011002-1 release? cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/