Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 00:23:28 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: /proc/uptime etc. - NtQuerySystemInformation() needs bigger structure Message-ID: <20020706042328.GA17865@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <004f01c22449$91da71a0$0100a8c0 AT advent02> <20020705200207 DOT GA11696 AT redhat DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 01:44:21PM +0930, Trevor Forbes wrote: >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Christopher Faylor" >> This is one thing that was fixed by the -fnative-struct gcc option which >> is, unfortunately, not available in gcc 3.1. > >Yes, but I thought that the -fnative-struct functionality moved >to -mms-bitfields in gcc 3.1? Is this correct? Sort of. There are still some missing bits, if some older mail from Danny on this subject is correct. I thought I just saw someone talking about implementing the functionality on the gcc trunk, too. Don't know what that's all about. In any event, this was a red herring. This wasn't the actual problem. Compiling things with -malign-double seems to fix the problem. I've regenned my gcc 3.1 compiler so that this is the default. Thanks to Danny Smith for setting me on the right track, here. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/