Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Originating-IP: [210.84.178.197]
Reply-To: "Trevor Forbes" <t4bs AT hotmail DOT com>
From: "Trevor Forbes" <t4bs AT hotmail DOT com>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <E17QTq3-0004vt-0X AT anchor-post-33 DOT mail DOT demon DOT net> <004f01c22449$91da71a0$0100a8c0 AT advent02> <20020705200207 DOT GA11696 AT redhat DOT com>
Subject: Re: /proc/uptime etc. - NtQuerySystemInformation() needs bigger structure
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 13:44:21 +0930
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Message-ID: <OE76UOF9vJZTuG5wQ0l000026a5@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Jul 2002 04:14:32.0312 (UTC) FILETIME=[A13BDF80:01C224A3]


----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
> This is one thing that was fixed by the -fnative-struct gcc option which
> is, unfortunately, not available in gcc 3.1.
>

Yes, but I thought that the -fnative-struct functionality moved
to -mms-bitfields in gcc 3.1? Is this correct?

Trevor



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/