Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 16:30:14 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: g++ global constructor bug?
Message-ID: <20020705203014.GA18639@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <200207052009 DOT g65K9Fr00451 AT new-york DOT lcs DOT mit DOT edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200207052009.g65K9Fr00451@new-york.lcs.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 04:09:15PM -0400, Douglas S. J. De Couto wrote:
>the following program doesn't work right with cygwin, it seems the
>global object sh constructor is not being called.

If I had to guess I'd say that the constructor is kicked off before
stdio is completely set up.

cgf

>--------------------
>
>#include <stdio.h>
>
>struct foobar {
>  foobar(int i) { printf ("foobar(%d)\n", i); }
>};
>
>foobar sh(1);
>
>int
>main(int argc, char **argv) {
>  foobar s(2);
>}
--
Please do not send me personal email with cygwin questions.
Use the resources at http://cygwin.com/ .

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/