Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "C. Ripple" To: Subject: RE: GCC 3.1 exception model? Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 19:36:04 +0200 Message-ID: <000001c22381$46a97820$0100a8c0@lony> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <20020704155138.GA19452@redhat.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com [mailto:cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com] On Behalf > Of Christopher Faylor > Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 5:52 PM > To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Subject: Re: GCC 3.1 exception model? > > On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 09:22:47AM +0200, C. Ripple wrote: > >>from reading the mailing list archives indicates that a release of a > >3.1 gcc-version for cygwin is immanent so I thought it might be of > >general interest to share my experience (5 ~ weeks) of compiling cygwin > >with a 3.1(.1) gcc. > > Coincidentally enough, the last two versions of the cygwin DLL, > and any other thing that I have released, have been compiled > with gcc 3.1.1. I thought that all recent cygwin dll versions had been compiled with some sort of (pre) 3.1 cross-compiler and mainly wanted to point out that the problems running the cygwin test suite with a natively compiled gcc (and linked to its libraries) you might be seeing go away if the tests are linked to an already installed cygwin dll (not new-cygwin1.dll). Anyway already a ``big thank you'' for your work in bringing cygwin's gcc up to ``standard''. /Christoph -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/