Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 23:53:59 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: access port 127.0.0.1:1052 Message-ID: <20020704035359.GD24996@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20020703203140 DOT 01b48528 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020703203140.01b48528@pop3.cris.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 08:46:18PM -0700, Randall R Schulz wrote: >Alex, > >According to , port 1052 is >assigned to: > >ddt 1052/tcp Dynamic DNS Tools >ddt 1052/udp Dynamic DNS Tools > >I don't know what "Dynamic DNS Tools" are, but perhaps it means something >to you or someone else here? There are quite a few Google hits on this >phrase. Doesn't Microsoft use something like Dynamic DNS in XP? I seem to recall reading that it was going to screw up older versions of UNIX bind. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/