Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Bryan Zimmer Reply-To: g91 AT baz-tech DOT com Organization: BAZ-TECH.COM To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: sshd Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 10:06:41 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1 References: <01d601c2223c$d1a83880$7346f6cc AT baztech DOT com> <20020703103359 DOT O21857 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> In-Reply-To: <20020703103359.O21857@cygbert.vinschen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200207031006.47168.g91@baz-tech.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sorry for the lack of details. I am using Win 2000 Professional. I installed Service Pack 2 last week. /bin/bash (C:\Cygwin\bin\bash.exe) definitely exists and is executable. However, it shows up only with ls -l /bin/bash.exe and not just "/bin/bash", which surprised me. It's file permissions are 0777 (-rwxrwxrwx). My Cygwin environment is set to the following: "ntsec notitle strace=0x1 binmode glob". My sshd is basically set up to accept hostbased or pubkey authentication. It has two keys, ssh_host_rsa_key, and ssh_host_dsa_key. It uses only protocol 2, never version 1. The public user keys are kept in %h/.ssh/authorized_keys2. Most of the "easy" sshd options are turned off. No RhostsRSAAuthentication, just RSA and DSA authentication. I had these options "Allow Users baz; Deny Users [A-Zac-z]*" which works in Linux, but I had to take it out for Cygwin. I also had to make sure the "Strict Modes" option was "no". Until I did a partial reinstall I was always UID 544, GID 513, Administrators:None. For some reason I am now a regular user, user number 1000. I chowned the relevant files just in case but this seems to make no difference. Very strange. Formerly I thought I knew something about both Cygwin and ssh. Thanks for your response. - -- Bryan A. Zimmer g91 AT baz-tech DOT com On Wednesday 03 July 2002 03:33 am, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 09:53:32PM -0500, Bryan Zimmer wrote: > > Greetings all. > > > > I used to have an sshd that worked passably well. Now it is giving > > me some strange messages, viz., "user baz is illegal because > > /bin/bash is not an executable. > > > > In this case I can only log in remotely when I remove /bin/bash > > from the /etc/passwd file. I find this strange behavior. > > What system, 9x or NT? With or w/o ntsec? What does ls -l > /bin/bash.exe print? > > Corinna - -- Bryan A. Zimmer baz AT baz-tech DOT com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9IxMBgQpxrvF+n0ERAi8bAJ0R3g2x7AhgpJ3aT0lcKp2A+YZT7ACguyzU FdAcEOwfbhvzTtJ1a9yFzKE= =mBCC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/