Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 01:15:38 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: SUBJECT ....
Message-ID: <20020703051538.GB20393@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <200207030304 DOT UAA04295 AT sumeru DOT stanford DOT EDU> <200207030304 DOT UAA04295 AT sumeru DOT stanford DOT EDU> <5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20020702203255 DOT 02643eb0 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020702203255.02643eb0@pop3.cris.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 08:37:57PM -0700, Randall R Schulz wrote:
>Chris,
>
>Whew! Thanks for that unequivocal reply.
>
>There's nothing worse (in the world of mailing lists) that such a hideous 
>sop to brain-dead mailers.
>
>This makes me suspect that we're about due for the counterpart to the 
>request for a [LIST-NAME] "Subject:" tag: having "Reply-To:" set by the 
>list server.

We're actually suffering from a bout of this internally.  All of our
internal mailing lists have been revamped and all of them now have the
detested [BLEURGH] subject prefix.  I've been spending a lot of time
eradicating it there, too.

>Perhaps that one should be put to rest, right away, too?

Reply-To?  Not no way, not no how.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/