Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 00:27:41 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Executing commands is VERY slow when logged into an NT domain.... Message-ID: <20020626042741.GA2682@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <1589386366 DOT 1025036323 AT ADobkin-1 DOT US DOT Nortel DOT Com> <20020626040943 DOT 86693 DOT qmail AT web10507 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020626040943.86693.qmail@web10507.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 09:09:43PM -0700, Rick Rankin wrote: >Corinna mentioned earlier in this thread that some strace output might be >helpful. I've attached two strace logs from running 'ls' in an empty directory. >The first is using the 1.3.10-1 DLL where don't see the slowdown, the second is >using the 20020625 snapshot of 1.3.11 where I do. The microsecond numbers in the 1.3.10 vs. 1.3.11 strace show that 1.3.11 is actually slightly faster than 1.3.10: 1.3.10: 1989 180504 [main] ls 436 _pinfo::exit: Calling ExitProcess 0 ^^^^^^ 1.3.11: 2447 169876 [main] ls 1480 _pinfo::exit: Calling ExitProcess 0 ^^^^^^ Are you sure you saw a slowdown in this instance? Because this is pretty puzzling if so. Given the fact that we cleaned up some of the startup code in cygwin for 1.3.11, the above figures are what I'd expect. cgf -- Please do not send me personal email with cygwin questions. Use the resources at http://cygwin.com/ . -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/