Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3D1681A1.9080304@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 22:19:13 -0400 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Gerrit @ cygwin" CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: usr/include/ndbm.h duplicate in cygwin-1.3.11-2 References: <72270677363 DOT 20020623235302 AT familiehaase DOT de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > Hallo cygwin, > > cygwin/cygwin-1.3.11-2 The UNIX emulation engine: > Sat Jun 22 02:59:41 2002 2879 usr/include/ndbm.h > > gdbm/gdbm-1.8.0-4 GNU dbm database routines (runtime version): > Wed Feb 20 03:05:51 2002 2003 usr/include/ndbm.h > > Both packages contain the header ndbm.h. On June 20, db(3) was added to newlib. Thus, newlib now ships db.h and ndbm.h. db.h will conflict with the new berkeley db package symlink, and ndbm.h as you point out conflicts with gdbm. However, since cygwin doesn't yet *export* the database functions, we can hide this problem in the short term by: 1) cygwin package shouldn't ship db.h or ndbm.h yet 2) leave the db() symbols out of cygwin.din That will give us some breathing room until 1.3.12. Ummm...chris? I just saw the new announcement for 1.3.11-3 -- I think you removed ndbm.h but db.h is still there... :-( --Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/