Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 14:57:18 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Re [2]: cygwin1.dll [1.3.11(CVS)]: Changes since 06/19 snapshot cause page fault in kernel32.dl Message-ID: <20020623185718.GA18739@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <002001c21a57$a2acb660$ac91a7cb AT DANNY> <20020623111053 DOT 19877 DOT qmail AT web21008 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020623111053.19877.qmail@web21008.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Sun, Jun 23, 2002 at 04:10:53AM -0700, Nicholas Wourms wrote: >According to that message, the patch was necessary to get sse and sse2 >code to work. If Chris reverts this patch, then I take it that using >march=athlon-4/mcpu=athlon-4 optimizations will no longer work properly? I'm only reverting the code as a test to see if it causes the problem to go away. I won't be releasing a version of binutils with these changes. If this proves to be the problem I'll work with Nick Clifton to figure out the best way to fix things. cgf >--- Danny Smith wrote: >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Danny Smith" >> To: >> Sent: Sunday, 23 June 2002 13:42 >> Subject: Re: cygwin1.dll [1.3.11(CVS)]: Changes since 06/19 snapshot >> cause page fault in kernel32.dl >> >> Ooops >> >> This may be culprit: >> >> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils-cvs/2002-06/msg00130.html -- Please do not send me personal email with cygwin questions. Use the resources at http://cygwin.com/ . -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/