Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <08d801c2192e$f17fa6a0$6132bc3e@BABEL> From: "Conrad Scott" To: References: <20020619062155 DOT GA22072 AT redhat DOT com> Subject: Re: binutils-20020616-1 test version available Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 15:21:31 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 "Christopher Faylor" wrote: > I put up a new version of binutils a couple of days ago as a "test" > package. This is just a refresh against the 2002-06-16 version of > binutils from CVS. It has many cygwin/windows specific fixes. > > Please check it out and report any problems to cygwin AT cygwin DOT com. I've just installed this and done a clean re-build of the cvs sources. The result is a non-working system. Cygwin processes die very early on. Just to confirm, this is the same code that worked fine when compiled with the previous binutils release. I realise this is a me-too of Pavel and Nicholas's comments, but I know that at least one of those two is working on a non-NT platform: so this is a (just to confirm it) win2k failure report. I'll try and have a look at what's happening (using the mingw gdb I suppose) but that'll have to be tomorrow, since I've used up all my time for today. // Conrad -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/