Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 13:07:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200206182007.NAA74473@idiom.com> X-Authentication-Warning: idiom.com: ixian set sender to ixian AT idiom DOT com using -f From: Eric De Mund To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: KSH on Cygwin Reply-to: Eric De Mund X-Humans-Reply-To: Eric De Mund X-URL: X-POM: The Moon is Waxing Gibbous (60% of Full) Organization: Ixian Systems, Inc. Folks, Corinna Vinschen: ] What I don't quite get is: Is there actually any important feature in ] ksh which isn't already available in bash/tcsh/zsh? There may be external considerations that trump feature considerations (given that none of these shells is a drop-in replacement for ksh). Some production hosts at some sites, or some hosts at government sites have prohibitions against contrib software being installed on them. The Solaris 2.6 production hosts at one former client of mine were restricted in this way. Shell scripts on these hosts were either ksh, csh, or sh scripts. If the engineer wanted/needed to do a quick and dirty test of their ksh script on a cygwin box on their desks, say, then first converting their script to bash, tcsh, or zsh wouldn't be useful. (The client in question did have a separate Solaris 2.6 development host, yet the above point is, I hope, still valid.) Regards, Eric May you dance like no one is subject to . -- Eric De Mund | Ixian Systems, Inc. | 53 49 B2 23 AF 6C 20 81 http://www.ixian.com/ead/ | Mountain View, CA | ED DD 4C 81 AA C9 D1 A5 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/