Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <3D0E1364.8030209@ece.gatech.edu>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 12:50:44 -0400
From: Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Phil Dempster <dempster AT lsil DOT com>
CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: cvs-1.11.2 test release
References: <00e201c2161a$e33be7f0$ce113e9b AT LSIL DOT COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Phil Dempster wrote:

> Personally, I prefer the inetd approach to a standalone daemon - seems to me
> there's too many services running already under Windows.  The closer the
> configuration is to Linux the better (since I work with both).


That's an setup issue.  You can run cvs as a standalone daemon -- 
without inetd -- on linux, too.

(BTW, :pserver: and :ntserver: and inetd/standalone daemon server 
support is a future goal, not an immediate goal. The immediate goal, 
after appropriate discussion and testing here, is to get a 
cvsnt-on-cygwin package that works *as well as* and *totally plug-in 
replacement compatible with* the current cvs-on-cygwin package.)

Then we worry about additional features.

--Chuck



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/