Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT syncretize DOT net>
To: <fergus AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: RE: New setup.exe v.2.249.2.2
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 20:01:17 +1000
Message-ID: <008901c211f8$184c9970$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
In-Reply-To: <000701c21190$9a301380$af7b1f3e@Fergus>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com 
> [mailto:cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com] On Behalf Of 
> fergus AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net
> Sent: Wednesday, 12 June 2002 7:40 AM
> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> Cc: fergus AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net
> Subject: New setup.exe v.2.249.2.2
> 
> 
> Both http://cygwin.com/setup.exe and
> http://cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-2.249.2.2.exe come up with
> v.2.249.2.2 as their ID when they are started, but their md5sum's are
> different. Is the first-named the later version and therefore 
> the one to
> try?

They are the same. The md5 difference is because one has been
recompressed with UPX, as part of the release process.

Rob


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/