Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <02cd01c20e3e$d2397fa0$42a18c09@wdg.uk.ibm.com>
From: "Max Bowsher" <maxb AT ukf DOT net>
To: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT syncretize DOT net>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <009c01c20e37$d925d2c0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
Subject: Re: Crashing setup.exe
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 17:17:29 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

Robert Collins <robert DOT collins AT syncretize DOT net> wrote:
>> I appreciate you are trying to prevent aimless discussion,
>> but setup's cache
>> _cannot_ be a black box.
> 
> I realize this. In fact it's not - and I've not suggested it be a black
> box... There are other bits of software - like the setup cache cleaner -
> that are very useful. They are intimately linked with setup's treatment
> of the cache however, and will have to change as it changes. What I'm
> trying to avoid is setup.exe's users getting the impression that there
> is any manipulation needed for setup to operate correctly.

Yes.

Max.



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/