Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 17:56:50 +0200 From: Pavel Tsekov Reply-To: Pavel Tsekov Organization: Syntrex, Inc. X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <8124126452.20020606175650@syntrex.com> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re[2]: 1.3.11(CVS): Possible bug involving temp file generation In-Reply-To: <4221375626.20020606171100@sy<20020606172842.J22789@cygbert.vinschen.de> References: <20020605132012 DOT 8086 DOT qmail AT web21002 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> <12220356170 DOT 20020605154358 AT syntrex DOT com> <20020605150849 DOT GF15167 AT redhat DOT com> <17118445663 DOT 20020606162210 AT syntrex DOT com> <20020606165907 DOT F22789 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <4221375626 DOT 20020606171100 AT sy <20020606172842 DOT J22789 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Corinna, Thursday, June 06, 2002, 5:28:42 PM, you wrote: CV> On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 05:11:00PM +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote: >> CV> It's not 0. See autoload.cc. >> >> I did, but got some hard time groking it :( >> >> But how do you explain this then (taken from the strace.log attached >> by Nicholas Wourms) ? >> >> ********************************************** >> Program name: C:\CYGNUS\CYGWIN\BIN\PATCH.EXE (601141) >> App version: 1003.9, api: 0.51 >> DLL version: 1003.11, api: 0.53 >> DLL build: 2002-06-04 09:27 >> OS version: Windows ME-4.90 >> Date/Time: 2002-06-04 10:31:36 >> ********************************************** >> >> 2142 57784 [main] PATCH 601141 handle_to_fn: nt name '' >> >> From what you say and what I can see in the code it look like this >> shouldn't be hapenning. CV> He used the version of 2002-06-04 while Chris patched CV> handle_to_fn() on 2002-06-05 ;-) Corinna, do you mean the changes in version 1.92 of dtable.cc ? I dont't see how this patch helps to solve the problem I'm describing ? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/