Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 14:07:12 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: handle_to_fn question
Message-ID: <20020604180712.GB1586@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <9929150115 DOT 20020604182833 AT syntrex DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9929150115.20020604182833@syntrex.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 06:28:33PM +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
>Hello, there! :)
>
>I may be wrong but this code from handle_to_fn seems wrong to me:
>
>static char *
>handle_to_fn (HANDLE h, char *posix_fn)
>{
>  OBJECT_NAME_INFORMATION *ntfn;
>  char fnbuf[32768];
>
>  memset (fnbuf, 0, sizeof (fnbuf));
>  ntfn = (OBJECT_NAME_INFORMATION *) fnbuf;
>  
>  // If I'm right for the case below this should read sizeof (fnbuf) -
>  // sizeof (OBJECT_NAME_INFORMATION).
>  ntfn->Name.MaximumLength = sizeof (fnbuf);
>
>  // I think that the right hand of the assignment is incorrect and it should be
>  // (WCHAR *) (ntfn + 1). Now it seems like ntfn->Name.Buffer will be
>  // assigned the addres of ntfn->Name.MaximumLength.
>  ntfn->Name.Buffer = (WCHAR *) ntfn + 1;

It's easy enough to test your theories by running this in a debugger.

Have you done so?

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/