Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: From: "Barnhart, Kevin" To: "'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" Subject: RE: run batch w/o .bat? Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 10:32:56 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain [Barnhart, Kevin] What sort of worms? How big is the can? Performance issues = me having to edit new batch files all the time. Kevin > > > > >Same here; it's just nice to not have to remember to tack on the .bat if > >possible. > > > > > Right. This has been discussed. It could be added but it opens up a can > of > worms and would likely result in performance issues as well. Searching > for > foo.exe and foo.bat (and foo.com and foo.sh and ...) whenever someone > types > "foo" is not ideal. > > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/