Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 12:16:58 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: numerous bugs i've found in cygwin while developing XEmacs
Message-ID: <20020604161658.GE11056@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20020603161900 DOT O269776 AT lidp DOT com> <20020603215715 DOT GA29758 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20020603215715.GA29758@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 05:57:15PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 04:19:00PM -0500, Michael Potter wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 03:59:45PM -0500, Michael Potter wrote:
>>> >>You should resubmit as an mmap only bug.  Cygipc's shmat support uses
>>> >>mmap, and cygwins 'native' shmat support is in development.  Chances
>>> >>are, any shmat bug reports will (unfortunately) end up in /dev/null.
>>> >
>>> >Just did.
>>> 
>>> And, I believe that this was a problem which was reported back in April.
>>> If so, it's been fixed in snapshots for a while. cgf 
>>
>>I did my home work :).
>
>So, you're saying that you you actually tried a cygwin snapshot?

Ping?  Did you try a snapshot?

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/