Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 15:26:19 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: numerous bugs i've found in cygwin while developing XEmacs Message-ID: <20020603192619.GB26504@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <02fd01c20b12$49edbff0$0201a8c0 AT neeeeeee> <20020603163346 DOT GB22575 AT redhat DOT com> <082e01c20b29$6bd04090$6132bc3e AT BABEL> <20020603185243 DOT GB25368 AT redhat DOT com> <08b201c20b33$0d4c7f70$6132bc3e AT BABEL> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <08b201c20b33$0d4c7f70$6132bc3e@BABEL> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 08:15:40PM +0100, Conrad Scott wrote: >"Christopher Faylor" wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 07:06:44PM +0100, Conrad Scott wrote: >> >I needed to download the (currently experimental) gdb 20020411-1 version >> >to be able to attach to processes, so there might be an easy fix for that >> >particular issue :-) >> >> gdb has been able to attach to a process for several years. > >Well, I'm not going to re-install the previous version to check this, but I >recall that I had to upgrade to get something pretty major to work; like, if >it wasn't attaching to processes it was using core files --- something on >that scale. But maybe it was just a phase of the moon error (or, gulp, pilot >error). This really isn't worth arguing about. I used the gdb from 2001/04 just a couple of days ago to attach to a running process. I believe I added the capability sometime in the 1998 timeframe. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/