Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2002 14:10:24 +0200
From: "Gerrit P. Haase" <gp AT familiehaase DOT de>
Reply-To: "Gerrit P. Haase" <gp AT familiehaase DOT de>
Organization: Esse keine toten Tiere
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <71222906823.20020602141024@familiehaase.de>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
CC: support AT sleepycat DOT com
Subject: berkeley db trouble
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hallo cygwin,

I would really like to see berkeley db in the Cygwin dist.
I tried again to rebuild and now I see that there are different
versions I used:

1.
Sleepycat Software: Berkeley DB 4.1.4: (February 13, 2002)

2.
Sleepycat Software: Berkeley DB 4.1.4: (March  2, 2002)

And I wonder why my patch doesn't fit anymore....
Why do they do such things?
Why don't they bump up the version if they make changes?


Gerrit
-- 
=^..^=


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/