Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 15:20:52 -0500
From: David T-G <davidtg-cygwin AT justpickone DOT org>
To: "CygWin Users' List" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Cc: Randall R Schulz <rrschulz AT cris DOT com>
Subject: Re: Bash complete (tab) slowdown?
Message-ID: <20020531202052.GC1231@justpickone.org>
References: <5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 0 DOT 20020531153844 DOT 02f32b88 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> <200205311916 DOT g4VJGgBR008222 AT tango DOT euteka DOT lt> <5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 0 DOT 20020531153844 DOT 02f32b88 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> <5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20020531131102 DOT 0244eec0 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LwW0XdcUbUexiWVK"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020531131102.0244eec0@pop3.cris.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i

--LwW0XdcUbUexiWVK
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Randall, et al --

=2E..and then Randall R Schulz said...
%=20
% BASH has hashing and provides some control over its operation:

How nice on both counts.


=2E..
% BASH builds its hash as individual commands are invoked and found via the=
=20

Aha!  So I wonder if the original problem happens for running the same
command again or only the first time a command is tabbed out.  QQ, can
you confirm or deny?


% PATH. For Tcsh to know these "up front," suggests, if not implies, that i=
t=20
% has to take the time to build that hash table which seems like it would=
=20

I believe it does, and I should think that you are right.  I haven't
tried any tests, though.


% slow down the process of starting up, unless it keeps some form of this=
=20
% hash in persistent (file) storage.

No, it definitely doesn't do that.


%=20
%=20
% Randall Schulz
% Mountain View, CA USA


HTH & HAND

:-D
--=20
David T-G                      * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) davidtg AT justpickone DOT org * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) davidtgwork AT justpickone DOT org
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/    Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!


--LwW0XdcUbUexiWVK
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE899skGb7uCXufRwARAunnAJ92DhzgivLabsCd1dvFEx+ZhVs3YQCcCW95
gyGDdVf5JSbh1Jw0/XVV+oQ=
=+GE+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--LwW0XdcUbUexiWVK--