Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Authentication-Warning: calypso.arrow: stuart owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 20:09:01 +0100 (BST)
From: Stuart Brady <sbrady AT ntlworld DOT com>
X-X-Sender: stuart AT calypso DOT arrow
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: RE: trivial mkpasswd defect
In-Reply-To: <INEKLKBFCDBPKMKAJLMDEEIOCDAA.bab@vx.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205291834270.1287-100000@calypso.arrow>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Wed, 29 May 2002, Bernard A Badger wrote:

> I hope you mean that '-?' will work, not that '-?' will be taken out of the
> usage.

Shouldn't it be -h rather than -?, for the same reason that -* would be 
a bad idea? What's wrong with --help anyway?
-- 
Stuart Brady


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/