Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 13:16:30 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: libkernel32.a missing TOOLHELP API exports Message-ID: <20020529171630.GA6442@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <157920282546 DOT 20020529102155 AT logos-m DOT ru> <000e01c20719$069d8ac0$fe00a8c0 AT laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000e01c20719$069d8ac0$fe00a8c0@laptop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 09:59:17AM -0400, Steven Edwards wrote: >> Process32First AT 8 is not present in kernel32.dll on nt4.0 sp5. >> I believe this kind of api is very OS-specific. On nt4.0 >> process enumeration functions are available from microsoft's >> psapi.dll included (among others) in Resource kit. > >The toolhelp apis exist on both Win98, 2k and XP. They are part of >kernel32.dll but are developed using a separate import lib (libth32.lib >under VS6). I didn't think that libth32.a existed in the w32api package >before I sent the email. Now the only question is if it is still the >same for Visual Studio.Net or did the move the th32 import information >to kernel32? If M$ did change it then we should also. If there is precedent for a separate library, then IMO that's what we should do. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/