Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 16:29:54 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: try try again Message-ID: <20020528202954.GB5277@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20020528201801 DOT BGJ19182 DOT mtiwmhc21 DOT worldnet DOT att DOT net AT webmail DOT worldnet DOT att DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020528201801.BGJ19182.mtiwmhc21.worldnet.att.net@webmail.worldnet.att.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 08:18:00PM +0000, perlspinr AT att DOT net wrote: >Still hoping that someone will find this important enough to answer. > >An updated detail is that I can override the value of "MACHTYPE" and >"HOSTTYPE" in Cygwin per se, but not in MSYS -- Earnie? CC:ing you >this time. Again, this is *not* an Msys mailing list. I find the concept of a cygwin fork annoying enough without having to see discussion of it here. If you have msys questions seek elsewhere. As to why it isn't i586 on your Pentium, after a cursory glance at the source (gasp!), it's obviously because this was the configuration triplet used to build bash. Performing complicated "what type of cpu is this?" checks is really not something I'd want my shell to spend time on. So bash apaprently wisely just provides information based on whatever it was built for. If you need better information, use uname. cgf >From: perlspinr AT att DOT net >To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com >Subject: A small question on machine id >Date: Sun, 26 May 2002 19:13:20 +0000 > >The formal architecture triplet like: >cpu-company-os(-kernel) > >on my Pentium machine gives >MACHTYPE=i686-pc-cygwin >and it's the same in Earnie's current Msys cygwin DLL - >based system as in Cygwin proper. > >I am wondering why? > >Obviously one would expect the shell variable value to be >"i586-pc-(cygwin|msys)"? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/