Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: RE: Setup as recommended reading X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 content-class: urn:content-classes:message Date: Sun, 26 May 2002 22:20:17 +1000 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: "Robert Collins" To: "Brian Gallew" Cc: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g4QCKbu10681 That's a workaround that requires ~ the same effort as storing all the package data. Rob > -----Original Message----- > From: Brian Gallew [mailto:geek AT burri DOT to] > Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2002 10:02 PM > To: Robert Collins > Cc: jim DOT george AT blueyonder DOT co DOT uk; cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Subject: RE: Setup as recommended reading > > > Robert Collins said: > > There is an implicit conflict there with setup, because > setup doesn't > > know what was available before - it only knows version for what is > > installed. That will change in the future. > > How about this: Allow packages to be marked "never install"? > Then setup can display all of the udpated or new packages, > yet give the user an easy way to control what (s)he has to look at? > > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/