Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 18:28:03 +0200 From: Pavel Tsekov Reply-To: Pavel Tsekov Organization: Syntrex, Inc. X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <16132654955.20020522182803@syntrex.com> To: "Cliff Hones" CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re[2]: setup-2.243 Crash / Install from Local Directory / WinXP In-Reply-To: <00a901c2019c$2c0caf70$cd8a9dc0@uk.aonix.com> References: <00a901c2019c$2c0caf70$cd8a9dc0 AT uk DOT aonix DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Cliff, Wednesday, May 22, 2002, 4:22:57 PM, you wrote: CH> Robert Collins wrote: >> C'mon Max, you *know* I need more detail than that. >> >> Install from Local works fine here. Even though it's only a snapshot, I >> wasn't aware of any -bugs- in the release. CH> Why doesn't http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-05/msg01210.html count CH> as a bug? Is it because it was on W98? I've been tracing the exception with a disassembler - I'm not quite positve why exactly does the fault occur, but I can say for sure that it was caused from some code inside LogSingleton or LogFile classes. Maybe an exception being thrown from one of these... I can't be sure because it seems that the source provided along with the binary snapshot is not exactly the same as the one from which the binary was compiled... Robert, can you confirm/deny this assumption ? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/