Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 13:10:11 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Adding col to cygutils. Message-ID: <20020522171011.GC3592@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20020522160309 DOT 16984 DOT qmail AT web20808 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020522160309.16984.qmail@web20808.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 09:03:09AM -0700, dawillis dawillis wrote: >Per the HOW-TO-CONTRIBUTE located in /usr/doc/cygutils-1.0.0, I have >put together a tarball, patch and a changelog entry for cygutils to >build col for use in CYGWIN. The reason I have done so is that I am >supporting some older shell scripts that make use of the command, and >it was easier to port col to CYGWIN than to rewrite the scripts. The >cygutil package seemed to be the appropriate location since other BSD >derived utilities, such as cal, are packaged there. I hope these >patches can be integrated quickly. Why are you contributing to cygutils rather than cygwin itself? >I would have attached the tarball and patch, but currently the mailing >list will not accept attachments over 100,000 bytes. Here's the >warning message: > >ezmlm-reject: fatal: Sorry, I don't accept messages larger than 100000 >bytes (#5.2.3) Well, of course. Why would you want to send a large attachment to the thousands of people reading this list? cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/