Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 07:41:32 -0400 From: Jason Tishler Subject: Re: rebase confussion with cygwin & Apache In-reply-to: <3CEB3A89.F6670025@insight.rr.com> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-followup-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-id: <20020522114132.GB2124@tishler.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i References: <3CEB3A89 DOT F6670025 AT insight DOT rr DOT com> Paul, On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 02:28:25AM -0400, Paul McFerrin wrote: > I looked thru the mailing list archive and there is lots of discussions > on this rebase problem but I can not find any solutions that I should > implement. What about this one? http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-05/msg01000.html > I'm still running cygwin 1.3.6. My questions are: > - Exactly what DLL needs to be rebased? "All" Cygwin DLLs or at least the ones that are loaded into Apache. > - Where do I get this rebase tool that supports the necessary options See the above URL. > - What argumments should I be using on the rebase command line? See the above URL. > - Do I need to upgrade to a newer version of cygwin to get this > problem solved? No, but you should upgrade anyway for other reasons. > - Or do I have to upgrade my Apache server? No. > I saw someone's example of rebase commandline used to solve their > problem but the arguments he used were not supported in the source > code that I saw in the archives. See the above URL. Jason -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/