Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
Path: not-for-mail
From: Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Newsgroups: gmane.os.cygwin
Subject: Re: name: GNU/cygwin system
Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 14:51:13 -0400
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <3CEA9721.1010303@ece.gatech.edu>
References: <FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA7600C60F7 AT itdomain003 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au> <20020517075122 DOT UWTH25565 DOT oe-ismta2 DOT bizmailsrvcs DOT net AT SMITH-MICHAEL DOT openwave DOT com> <20020517164815 DOT GK22415 AT redhat DOT com> <20020521053722 DOT PIZS18164 DOT oe-ismta1 DOT bizmailsrvcs DOT net AT SMITH-MICHAEL DOT openwave DOT com> <20020521144206 DOT GA16046 AT redhat DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: c-24-98-131-105.atl.client2.attbi.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1022006862 31523 24.98.131.105 (21 May 2002 18:47:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 18:47:42 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2
X-Accept-Language: en-us



Christopher Faylor wrote:

> 
> You're working from an assumption that cygwin is an unknown project.
> It is currently the most popular project on sources.redhat.com, so I
> don't think it is suffering too badly from lack of awareness.


I don't disagree with your conclusion, Chris, but you're using a flawed 
model.  So *what* if cygwin is the most popular project on 
sources.redhat? Sure, sources.redhat hosts gcc and binutils -- but how 
many people actively hack gcc, and/or download it directly from its 
homepage?  Most people just get gcc (and bzip, and ... ) from their 
distributor.  Hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of people use gcc 
daily (now THAT's publicity) -- but only a tiny tiny tiny fraction will 
ever visit sources.redhat.

With cygwin, everyone who uses it will at some point visit 
sources.redhat...that is cygwin's primary locus of publicity.  The other 
projects have many more publicity locii.

However, I do agree that cygwin is pretty well known -- if only as the 
black sheep of the free software family (Imagine! Allowing Gatesians to 
use GNU software.  The horror!)  Or better, as the dangling carrot of 
the free software world within the walls that Bill built.

--Chuck




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/