Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3CE7FE3E.80602@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 15:34:22 -0400 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: test -devel versions of the autotools References: <3CDF29A7 DOT 3040600 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3CE5DD92 DOT 1070306 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Since there were no objections, I am going to mark these packages current -- with one caveat: I've found a problem with autoconf-2.53a, but the same behavior is exhibited by autoconf-2.53. So, I'm going to mark autoconf-devel-2.53a-1 current, but remove a-d-2.53-1 so that a-d-2.52-4 remains the "prev" choice. I haven't yet checked if autoconf-2.52 exhibits the same bug. More later. --Chuck Charles Wilson wrote: > Charles Wilson wrote: > >> I've uploaded test versions of: >> >> autoconf-devel-2.53a-1 >> automake-devel-1.6.1-3 >> libtool-devel-20020502-2 > > > [snip] > > >> Ralf, Robert, Corinna, other interested parties, please give these a >> good workout. Notes on test results and my comments below. > > > Robert has reported success with these packages; anyone else? > > Any objections to marking these packages "current" (go back an read the > message that this one is in reply to...)? > > --Chuck > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/