Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 16:35:51 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: vi is mssing Message-ID: <20020518203551.GC21930@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <004601c1fea5$84cf4680$128e1941 AT alleluja> <20020518195334 DOT GA21930 AT redhat DOT com> <005c01c1fea7$f41d9ee0$128e1941 AT alleluja> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <005c01c1fea7$f41d9ee0$128e1941@alleluja> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Sat, May 18, 2002 at 04:09:39PM -0400, hongxun lee wrote: >Crazy, i installed almost all packages but it is missing.. There is no >independent package for vi, right? No, not right. I provided you with a URL. That + some actual effort in inspecting things should be sufficient. Here it is again: http://cygwin.com/packages/ . >I dl the packages directly by FTP, not followed the guide when setup.exe >running, and then set it up; Does it make such a diff? Sorry. Can't parse that. If you are not using setup.exe to install things then you are really on your own. One would assume that if you are bypassing the normal method of installing things then you would have sufficient knowledge to do it yourself. Otherwise there is no reason for you to do things the hard way. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/