Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3CE6300E.3020503@lapo.it> Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 12:42:22 +0200 From: Lapo Luchini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; it-IT; rv:1.0rc3) Gecko/20020516 X-Accept-Language: it, en, fr, es MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mailing List: CygWin Subject: Re: PGP signatures for packages? References: <001f01c1fe1c$ecd4e840$c23fa8c0 AT transarc DOT ibm DOT com> <3CE5E1AF DOT 8080709 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > We need a cygwin build -- perhaps built using a cygwin-targetted cross > compiler on linux-host, but definitely not using a > native-mswindows(mingw) targetted cross compiler on any host platform. This ML message says it is not "so easy" to compile latest version for Cygwin: http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2002-May/012886.html But there are patches around for gnupg-1.0.6 (latest is 1.0.7) for cygwin-1.3.2, I'll investigate more on this as I would like to package it for cygwin. > 1 cygwin cygwin "self-hosted cygwin build" Meaning this type of compiling ;) BTW: Charles could you please reply me to the CVS messages? Even a "I don't know/I'm working on it/No time to write a good reply/Dunno" would be good, just to know you read them ^_^ -- Lapo 'Raist' Luchini lapo AT lapo DOT it (PGP & X.509 keys available) http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796) -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/