Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 23:43:22 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: PGP signatures for packages? Message-ID: <20020517034322.GD22415@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <000501c1fd52$a512c1a0$c23fa8c0 AT transarc DOT ibm DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000501c1fd52$a512c1a0$c23fa8c0@transarc.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 11:26:30PM -0400, Michael Young wrote: >Are signatures available for the setup program, or for the packages it >downloads? >RPM uses GPG signatures, but I can't find anything comparable for the Cygwin >binaries. Even just a list of hashes would be worthwhile (ideally vended from >a secure Cygwin/Redhat web page) to verify that a mirror (or download) hasn't >been corrupted. Real PGP signatures would be better. I can live without tool >support -- I can do the verifications manually, but only if I can find the >signatures :-). > >I saw a note back in December >(http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2001-12/msg00950.html) >that touched on this, but I couldn't find any followup. Did this wither on the >vine? No. It's actually part of the current setup.exe. FWIW, md5sums in the download directories have been available for years. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/