Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <20020515210242.94866.qmail@web10501.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 14:02:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Rick Rankin Subject: Re: Circular symlinks in terminfo-5.2-2.tar.bz2 To: Rick Rankin , Charles Wilson Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii --- Rick Rankin wrote: > > In short, I'm not at all sure how it worked before. I need to look at the > source for less to understand how it determines that a terminal is "not fully > functional" and proceed from there. > Well, it seems that the problem is specific to the way Cygwin's distribution of less was compiled. The Cygwin binary was compiled without ncurses: $ cygcheck less.exe Found: .\less.exe Found: C:\cygwin\bin\less.exe .\less.exe .\cygwin1.dll C:\WINNT\System32\KERNEL32.dll C:\WINNT\System32\NTDLL.DLL .\cygpcre.dll When I compiled the source *with* ncurses, less worked perfectly with TERM=nxterm. Is there a reason that the Cygwin binary was compiled without ncurses (e.g., minimize package dependencies)? --Rick __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/