Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 15:45:08 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: setup.exe problem Message-ID: <20020514194508.GA26403@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-xfree AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <200205141856 DOT g4EIu9l23166 AT pilot18 DOT cl DOT msu DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 08:41:43PM +0100, Sam Edge wrote: >Harold L Hunt wrote in <200205141856 DOT g4EIu9l23166 AT pilot18 DOT cl DOT msu DOT edu> >on Tue, 14 May 2002 14:56:09 EDT: >>You're complaining about openbox, which is a Cygwin/XFree86 package. >>You know better than to send this inquiry to the Cygwin list > >As I explained, I suspect the problem is with setup.exe since the >package archive file appears to be perfectly fine. It extracts >correctly using tar but not using setup.exe. However, it makes sense to discuss this in the forum designed for it with the people who created the package and let them make this determination. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/