Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-WM-Posted-At: avacado.atomice.net; Thu, 9 May 02 22:14:20 +0100 Message-ID: <052501c1f79e$7c4dee20$0100a8c0@advent02> From: "Chris January" To: References: <5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20020509170045 DOT 060a8530 AT lnxmain> Subject: Re: Processes forking on their own? Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 22:14:20 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 > Some of my shell scripts on Windows 2000 Server (NTFS partition) seem to be forking their commands. > This has the effect of everything in a script trying to run at once, which royally screws up dependencies. This seems to only happen sometimes. All in all, general system behavior is bad. Well in a script shells will always use either fork or spawn to launch other commands. Do you mean that the shell isn't waiting for the command to finish? > > Worse yet and perhaps unrelated: when starting a process which forks itself, when the controlling window closes, that process dies too (pg_ctl start). I can't seem to keep my database up unless i avoid using pg_ctl. SIGHUP related? If you close the controlling window, SIGHUP will get sent to the forked children. If they don't catch the signal, they will die. Regards Chris -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/