Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020509074622.00b06190@pop3.cris.com> X-Sender: rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 07:50:11 -0700 To: "Robert Collins" , "Lapo Luchini" , "CygWin" From: Randall R Schulz Subject: RE: bash icon link In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Robert, I don't follow. Why is one "data driven" and the other not? Actually, it would do a lot more for me if I didn't have to deselect the two check-boxes on the final dialog of Setup.exe every time I run it. Randall Schulz Mountain View, CA USA At 23:37 2002-05-08, Robert Collins wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Lapo Luchini [mailto:lapo AT lapo DOT it] > > Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 4:31 PM > > To: CygWin > > Subject: bash icon link > > > > > > I think everyone is already using "c:\cygwin\bin\bash.exe --login -i" > > instead of the batch file (and its "terminate the process (Y/N)" > > annoyaince)... any reasong not to creaste it directly by setup.exe? > >Yes, setup.exe should be data driven. > >Rob -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/