Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 13:29:05 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: ftp / inetd problem
Message-ID: <20020508172905.GA6152@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <229D7C0FE0BED311A0E800805F0DD471010D2DF9 AT wn01ex DOT wn DOT gb DOT solvay DOT com> <5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20020508094140 DOT 027969a8 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020508094140.027969a8@pop3.cris.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 09:59:14AM -0700, Randall R Schulz wrote:
>>Recent cygwin snapshots should fix this problem.
>
>But I now that I read Chris's brief reply, I'm uncertain whether the patch 
>he mentions is to tar or to Cygwin1.dll, but my guess is that it's the 
>latter.

"Recent cygwin snapshots should fix this problem" would sort of preclude
the need for guessing that it would be a tar patch.

That + Corinna's response:

http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-04/msg00481.html

really should be pretty clear.

I don't know if this solves the problem mentioned in this email or not.
There is an obvious way to find out if it does.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/